I've been following your work


Run the Room

Consider this before you hit send

It's seven-thirty on a Tuesday morning and I'm at the kitchen table reading a cold email from a stranger.

The first sentence is about him.

The second sentence is about him.

The third sentence is about him.

By the fourth I've stopped reading and have started doing guilt gymnastics: "am I allowed to delete his email without feeling bad?"

To be honest, he hasn't yet given me a ton of reasons to feel bad. In three carefully edited paragraphs, he never asked himself the only question that mattered before he hit send: what did you make easier for the recipient?

The person on the other end of every cold email you write is at her kitchen table, or her Monday standup, or the back of her Uber to LaGuardia, and she is not, in those thirty seconds, curious about you.

The fix is three words:

You. The first sentence is about the recipient, not the sender. Something specific you noticed: what they said at a conference or on a podcast, an article they authored, a piece of work they did and why it matters. In other words: proof you did your homework.

"Caught your guest appearance on the Silicon Valley & The Void and loved your point about why checking Slack notifications at midnight is a digital manifestation of human suffering."

Them. The second sentence is still about the recipient! Show you understand their goals, priorities, or worldview:

"Unfortunately, knowing that Slack is a prison doesn't stop your product managers from sending 'quick question' pings that slowly erode your team's collective will to live."

Us. Only here do you appear. And when you appear, you appear to make something easier for them.

"That's why I thought my work on an emergency ejection seat from this capitalist nightmare might be helpful."

Then you make your ask. It should be small, specific, and serviceable. One specific question, not a free-floating offer of conversation. Something you'll bring to the table so they don't have to prepare:

[CTA] "Would you be open to a 20 minute talk to plan our escape?

Try this

Open the last cold outreach you sent and count the sentences before the recipient appears as the subject of a sentence.

If the count is anything other than zero...well, now you know for next time!

🌿 From I, I, I to you, them, us.

Ready to Get in the Room?

If you're trying to break in...


RUN THE ROOM

Your weekly briefing on making it easy to move decisions that matter.

Forwarded this email? Subscribe here to get next week’s Run the Room in your inbox


128 City Road, London EC1V 2NX
Unsubscribe · Preferences

Run the Room

Get in the room. Run it. Change what happens when you leave. That's the work I do with senior leaders moving standards from concept to institutional adoption. My work has been featured in The New York Times, TIME, The Lancet, and Foreign Policy. Each Saturday, one short note on making it easy to move decisions that matter—three minutes to read, used in next week's meeting.

Read more from Run the Room

Run the Room The Big Lever Behind the Bloom ↓ Most years, the floor of Death Valley is gravel. Known as the hottest, lowest, and driest place in North America, the desert holds the record for the hottest air ever measured on Earth. But this spring, it went yellow. Fields of gold appeared along Badwater Road in the biggest bloom the park had seen for a decade. The best part? The seeds had been sitting in the gravel the whole time. They were waiting for a condition: a storm heavy enough to...

Run the Room Can it really not be done? ↓ In 2000, a year of antiretroviral therapy cost about $10,000 per patient. Health ministries across Africa built treatment plans underneath that number and reached the same conclusion: treating everyone was unaffordable. That was a reasonable conclusion. Then in February 2001, the Indian generics manufacturer Cipla offered governments and NGOs a three-drug combination for $350 a year. Nine months later, the Doha Declaration confirmed that the generic...

Run the Room What if you’re not risk-averse, but leverage-blind? ↓ There's a lot of hullabaloo about the billions of dollars now flowing into philanthropy from the AI boom. And while there's plenty of speculation about where it will go, there's also an emerging consensus: a lot of it (a lot!) will go toward "GiveWell"-style giving: interventions with strong evidence, measurable outcomes, and a reasonably clear answer to the question, “What did this dollar buy?” And this prompts a much larger...