profile

Run the Room

The fastest way to lose a 30-person room

Published 6 months ago • 1 min read

Run the Room

If you don’t have time for names, you don’t have time for change

↓

Most meetings happen in small groups or one-on-one.

But every once in a while, you might find yourself on a big group call.

20 people.
30 people.
A steering committee, a task force, a country delegation.

And the host will open with:
“We’ve got a lot to cover, so we’ll skip intros and jump straight into the agenda.”

It sounds efficient.

It isn’t.

When you skip names, you’re sending a very specific signal: It doesn’t really matter who’s here.

And if it doesn’t matter whether someone is here, they’ll soon choose not to be.

They’ll turn their camera off.
Check email.
Stay silent when you need their input.
Or worse—disengage from the process entirely after the call.

Try this:

The next time you’re hosting a large group call:

Greet people as they enter by name.Thank them specifically for being there.

Every few greetings: ask a short question about the person's day.

If you wouldn’t let someone walk into a live meeting room without acknowledging them, don’t do it online.

If you’re not hosting, see how many names you can fit into the first 15 seconds of the first time you speak.

“Thanks so much, Aisha, for hosting this.
Great to see you, Maria and Joseph on the call. Your inputs will be so valuable. And thanks, Lindiwe, for the memo you circulated in advance.”

Then make your point.

🌿 Presence precedes participation.

How many hours?

It turns out, names aren't the time waster.

How many hours did you spend last week in meetings that:

• Ended without a clear decision
• Required follow-up clarification
• Created more email instead of less
• Drifted because no one named what was really happening

Two hours?

Five?

Ten?

Most professionals don’t have an influence problem.
They have a friction problem.

And friction compounds.

One unclear close becomes three follow-ups.
One unnamed concern becomes quiet resistance.
One soft “yes” becomes a delayed project.

Multiply that across a quarter.

Inside the Influence Masterclass, we’re reducing the drag.

Fewer meetings.
Less chasing.
More momentum.

If smoother execution would give you back even a few hours a month, this pays for itself quickly.

Register here ⤵

Weekly insights on building influence without authority—so you can run the room, shape outcomes, and move systems.

Forwarded this email? Subscribe here to get next week’s Run the Room in your inbox

600 1st Ave, Ste 330 PMB 92768, Seattle, WA 98104-2246
​Unsubscribe · Preferences​

Run the Room

Get in the room. Run it. Change what happens when you leave. That's the work I do with senior leaders moving standards from concept to institutional adoption. My work has been featured in The New York Times, TIME, The Lancet, and Foreign Policy. Each Saturday, one short note on making it easy to move decisions that matter—three minutes to read, used in next week's meeting.

Read more from Run the Room

Run the Room The Big Lever Behind the Bloom ↓ Most years, the floor of Death Valley is gravel. Known as the hottest, lowest, and driest place in North America, the desert holds the record for the hottest air ever measured on Earth. But this spring, it went yellow. Fields of gold appeared along Badwater Road in the biggest bloom the park had seen for a decade. The best part? The seeds had been sitting in the gravel the whole time. They were waiting for a condition: a storm heavy enough to...

3 days ago • 3 min read

Run the Room Can it really not be done? ↓ In 2000, a year of antiretroviral therapy cost about $10,000 per patient. Health ministries across Africa built treatment plans underneath that number and reached the same conclusion: treating everyone was unaffordable. That was a reasonable conclusion. Then in February 2001, the Indian generics manufacturer Cipla offered governments and NGOs a three-drug combination for $350 a year. Nine months later, the Doha Declaration confirmed that the generic...

10 days ago • 1 min read

Run the Room What if you’re not risk-averse, but leverage-blind? ↓ There's a lot of hullabaloo about the billions of dollars now flowing into philanthropy from the AI boom. And while there's plenty of speculation about where it will go, there's also an emerging consensus: a lot of it (a lot!) will go toward "GiveWell"-style giving: interventions with strong evidence, measurable outcomes, and a reasonably clear answer to the question, “What did this dollar buy?” And this prompts a much larger...

17 days ago • 3 min read