What if the thing stopping your plan isn't actually fixed?


Run the Room

Can it really not be done?

In 2000, a year of antiretroviral therapy cost about $10,000 per patient.

Health ministries across Africa built treatment plans underneath that number and reached the same conclusion: treating everyone was unaffordable.

That was a reasonable conclusion.

Then in February 2001, the Indian generics manufacturer Cipla offered governments and NGOs a three-drug combination for $350 a year. Nine months later, the Doha Declaration confirmed that the generic price could be acted on. Over the next six years, the median price of first-line therapy across developing countries fell to about $90.

The medicine hadn't changed. The price had. And the price turned out to depend on who was arguing, how hard, and for how long. $10,000 had been treated as a hard fact about the medicine, when it was actually incredibly elastic.

Every plan has a sentence like that in it.

The ministry can't afford it.

The board won't go for it.

Procurement takes nine months.

Eleven people have to agree, and you only have influence over two.

These premises set the ceiling of a plan before anyone has said a word about strategy because they sound like arithmetic rather than opinion.

Worse than unchallenged premises are unstated ones. Because once a premise goes unnamed, nobody even has to defend it!

Look, many premises survive contact. Procurement really might take nine months. Your board really might say no.

But sometimes, these premises are wrong. And that's when the magic happens.

Try this

Write down the three things your current plan treats as fixed.

Next to each one, write the last time anyone actually tested it.

If you can't remember, that's useful information ;)

Sometimes the strategy is not finding a better way around the constraint. It is discovering the constraint was never quite as fixed as it seemed.

🌿 Test, don't tell.

Can't be done" is usually just the memory of the last time somebody tried.
Send me the three premises from the exercise above. I'll tell you which one I'd test first and how↓


RUN THE ROOM

Your weekly briefing on making it easy to move decisions that matter.

Forwarded this email? Subscribe here to get next week’s Run the Room in your inbox


128 City Road, London EC1V 2NX
Unsubscribe · Preferences

Run the Room

Get in the room. Run it. Change what happens when you leave. That's the work I do with senior leaders moving standards from concept to institutional adoption. My work has been featured in The New York Times, TIME, The Lancet, and Foreign Policy. Each Saturday, one short note on making it easy to move decisions that matter—three minutes to read, used in next week's meeting.

Read more from Run the Room

Run the Room The Big Lever Behind the Bloom ↓ Most years, the floor of Death Valley is gravel. Known as the hottest, lowest, and driest place in North America, the desert holds the record for the hottest air ever measured on Earth. But this spring, it went yellow. Fields of gold appeared along Badwater Road in the biggest bloom the park had seen for a decade. The best part? The seeds had been sitting in the gravel the whole time. They were waiting for a condition: a storm heavy enough to...

Run the Room What if you’re not risk-averse, but leverage-blind? ↓ There's a lot of hullabaloo about the billions of dollars now flowing into philanthropy from the AI boom. And while there's plenty of speculation about where it will go, there's also an emerging consensus: a lot of it (a lot!) will go toward "GiveWell"-style giving: interventions with strong evidence, measurable outcomes, and a reasonably clear answer to the question, “What did this dollar buy?” And this prompts a much larger...

Run the Room And the three things you need first ↓ I had requested forty-seven one-to-ones through the app before I arrived. Volunteers, most of them a few years out of university, directed traffic at the stairwells for free. Nobody was late. It was the last weekend of May and I was at a conference put on by effective altruists. Last week I wrote about our tendency to confuse choosing a simpler problem with making the solution easier. A lot of people assumed it was an underhanded indictment...