You’re not in charge. Now what?


Run the Room

How to redirect without being a jerk

The conversation is drifting.

You can feel it.

Wrong problem.
Wrong direction.
Thirty-seven minutes of your life you'll never get back.

But you’re not running the darn meeting.

So you sit there and consider your options:
1) If you interrupt, you risk looking territorial.
2) If you stay quiet, you waste the full 60 minutes—for everyone.

I’m writing about this because this week, one of you dropped me a line saying, "what if I'm not the one in charge? What if I'm supposed to be supporting the discussion not chairing it?"

It gave me an immediate flashback: I could feel the tension rising in my chest as I remembered a recent meeting in which we solved for something adjacent to the actual decision we needed to make.

Here’s what I’ve learned the hard way:

The move is definitely not frustration. That makes you look unhinged and triggers defensiveness every time.

You also don't have to sit there and take it.

The best move is curiosity.

Try this:

The next time you find yourself in this dilemma, try this script:

"I want to make sure we're using our time well here. It sounds like we're solving for [X], but I thought our goal today was [Y]. Could someone help me understand: has the goal changed, or are we taking a detour? I want to make sure I'm tracking with everyone."

Why it works:

1) Redirects without asserting authority. It frames the redirect as a clarification question rather than a correction.

2) Invites others to co-own the decision to get back on track. This creates collective accountability rather than putting you in the role of enforcer.

If you've ever walked out of a meeting thinking,
"I should have said that differently," this is for you.

Last week, over 350 of you asked for my influence scripts.

I sent them.

But scripts aren’t the real skill.

The real skill is reading resistance, challenging authority, and shifting momentum in real time — when the stakes are high.

So I’m teaching this live:

Leading Without Authority: An Influence Masterclass
(90 min, live)

You’ll learn how to:

  • Surface hidden resistance before it derails progress
  • Challenge authority without triggering defensiveness
  • Convert soft agreement into real commitment
  • Create urgency without panic


This isn’t about memorizing lines
(Though if you missed the scripts, they're here)

It’s about reading power dynamics as they unfold — and responding with precision when it matters.

If you’re ready to stop replaying conversations in your head and start handling them in the moment:

Founding rate: $99 (expires in one week)

Then: $147

Live. Limited seats.


Weekly insights on building influence without authority—so you can run the room, shape outcomes, and move systems.

Forwarded this email? Subscribe here to get next week’s Run the Room in your inbox


600 1st Ave, Ste 330 PMB 92768, Seattle, WA 98104-2246
Unsubscribe · Preferences

Run the Room

Get in the room. Run it. Change what happens when you leave. That's the work I do with senior leaders moving standards from concept to institutional adoption. My work has been featured in The New York Times, TIME, The Lancet, and Foreign Policy. Each Saturday, one short note on making it easy to move decisions that matter—three minutes to read, used in next week's meeting.

Read more from Run the Room

Run the Room The Big Lever Behind the Bloom ↓ Most years, the floor of Death Valley is gravel. Known as the hottest, lowest, and driest place in North America, the desert holds the record for the hottest air ever measured on Earth. But this spring, it went yellow. Fields of gold appeared along Badwater Road in the biggest bloom the park had seen for a decade. The best part? The seeds had been sitting in the gravel the whole time. They were waiting for a condition: a storm heavy enough to...

Run the Room Can it really not be done? ↓ In 2000, a year of antiretroviral therapy cost about $10,000 per patient. Health ministries across Africa built treatment plans underneath that number and reached the same conclusion: treating everyone was unaffordable. That was a reasonable conclusion. Then in February 2001, the Indian generics manufacturer Cipla offered governments and NGOs a three-drug combination for $350 a year. Nine months later, the Doha Declaration confirmed that the generic...

Run the Room What if you’re not risk-averse, but leverage-blind? ↓ There's a lot of hullabaloo about the billions of dollars now flowing into philanthropy from the AI boom. And while there's plenty of speculation about where it will go, there's also an emerging consensus: a lot of it (a lot!) will go toward "GiveWell"-style giving: interventions with strong evidence, measurable outcomes, and a reasonably clear answer to the question, “What did this dollar buy?” And this prompts a much larger...